Para quem não percebeu porque a Porsche quer controlar a VW

[MRS]

Leiam que é interessante e diz estratégicamente a verdade.
O que está em causa é de facto o futuro da Porsche.
MRS

Porsche insists VW gambit was not about the money, really
It says buying up VW shares was a bid for technology, never mind the tidy windfall.
By Ken Bensinger


Largely overlooked in the Detroit Big Three death watch/three-ring circus has been one of the most incredible examples of clever stock trading in modern history. And it happened at a car company.

Last month, Porsche surprised the world by announcing it had acquired a nearly 43% stake in Volkswagen with an option to buy 32% more. Without anybody noticing, wee little Porsche, maker of scarcely 100,000 cars a year, had cornered a 75% position in VW, which cranks out nearly 6 million vehicles.


And since nobody guessed how large Porsche's position was beforehand, short sellers suddenly got caught with their pants down, driving VW stock into the ionosphere. VW shares quintupled, peaking at over 1,000 euros and making VW, briefly, the most valuable company in the world.

Needless to say, Porsche found itself in the catbird seat. Its gambit allowed it to sell an undisclosed part of its position without having to cede control of the bigger carmaker. It was a great example of the business acumen of a company that has the highest profit margins in the world of cars.

How high? About 12% high, said Klaus Berning, a member of Porsche's board and head of sales and marketing for the company, who helped introduce Porsche's new Boxster and Cayman models at the Los Angeles Auto Show this month.


But the highlight of his speech was the revelation that, incredibly, Porsche's acquisition of the VW stake isn't about the money. Apparently it's about saving Porsche. "Our VW strategy is part of protecting Porsche," Berning said. "It is our guarantee that Porsche will remain Porsche."

The startling remark -- that without Goliath, David was imperiled -- largely fell on deaf ears because the audience was more concerned with the new double-clutch gearbox on display than, well, a multibillion-dollar acquisition that shook the financial world, or the fact that one of the company's executives suggested that hugely profitable Porsche was somehow in trouble.

Approached afterward, Berning elaborated. Apparently, Porsche is not on the verge of bankruptcy. Instead, the acquisition would allow the smaller automaker to rely on VW's considerable engineering capacity to help it develop a new hybrid drivetrain for its Cayenne SUV, as well as on other technological advances in development.

"A company of our size needs a technological partner," he said. "To secure our projects, we had to make sure [VW] would not go to some sort of investment fund.

"That we made money out of the hedges is a nice thing," Berning continued, "but the main objective was to get the technology."

Let's get this straight. Porsche, which made 3.6 billion euros last year from investments and 1 billion euros from selling cars, bought the profitable Volkswagen, one of the world's top six producers of vehicles and a regional powerhouse in Europe, South America and elsewhere, just because it can help it make a hybrid version of the Cayenne, only about 10,000 of which (without the hybrid option) have sold in the U.S. this year?

As the old saw goes, when someone says it's not about the money, it's about the money.

Bensinger is a Times staff writer.

[Pure911]

"Porsche, which made 3.6 billion euros last year from investments and 1 billion euros from selling cars"

And it's NOT about the money???????????????

táaaa bem abelha ....

[MRS]

Eu limito-me a difundir a informação -homem informado vale por dois-e cada um que tire as conclusões que quiser.

Só não digam é que este fórum não está actualizado ao dia à cerca da marca.

MRS

[Drake]

Mas entretanto parece que afinal só tomarão uma posição mais definitiva após o primeiro trimestre de 2009, vão esperar para ver....
A sobrevivencia na industria automovel será para aqueles que tiverem uma variada gama de produtos e uma estratégia de tentar chegar a vários nichos, ainda que sempre num segmento muito especifico de viaturas de alto prestigio, luxo mas acima de tudo com cariz desportivo como a marca que adoramos.
Marca que deu a volta muito bem dada foi a BMW. Vejam que no inicio dos anos 90 tinham o 3,5 e 7 (o 8 não conta aqui e o 6 antigo tinha "morrido nos anos 80"). o Z1 aparece quase como conceito, mas alguns anos mais tarde aparece mesmo o Z3 e depois o Z8. Compram o Grupo Rover e com isso as marcas que lá estavam. Sacam a tecnologia 4x4 e "inventam" o X5, depois o X3 e agora fala-se do X1. o Z3 deu lugar ao Z4, o concept Z9 foi a base do actual 6, o CS iria ser eventualmente o novo Z8 se não tivesse estourado esta crise. Abaixo do 3, inventaram o 1 e ainda mais abaixo como não cabia mais nada fizeram renascer a MINI e acima do 7 como suprasumo do luxo reinventaram a RollsRoyce. Se a esta catrefada de marcas e modelos, fizermos as derivações para berlinas, coupes, cabrios, tourings etc etc vê-se porque é que eles ganaham rios de dinheiro.
Mas atenção que estas estratégias só são rentáveis com segmentos bem definidos e marcas fortes, pois a BMW não hesitou em deixar cair a Rover, a Range Rover a Land Rover e a HIllman que está algures adormecida...

Bem, isto é apenas uma opinião e respeito as outras, mesmo que contrárias ao que eu penso sobre a industria automóvel.